Rudiments of my Shallow Political Understanding: for Future Reference

One thing negative about dialectics is that it presupposes the end of all objects of evaluation are contradictions. This is so frustrating that it immediately dampens any attempt to probe into any questions like that. That is remotely true of why somewhere along the line i stopped being the child who by nature liked to think about all the things ranging from food to the universe, and suddenly joined the majority of the public who can't think and would not make any attempt in that direction. When i no longer trusted my own thinking ability, i stopped thinking and caught hold of anything that was crammed to me. I became stupid and highly suggestible.
-------------------
It is just that under the influence of decades of education which tells them fixed answers about what is right and wrong, they come out not calling it wrong. They tend to accept the society the way it is and think that it is the best result because they have not seen otherwise. What all the politics teacher do is to tell the students a modified and spun theory which is near perfect after all those remedies, and it appears that where we are now is out of history necessity and every decision the party make is right, and our time is best of all; the reality may not be perfect but it is the best outcome and we are getting better and better, so....

You want every student to live up to the fullest of their potentials and know about the truth, but the country or the party can't afford to allow that happen. And after so many years of modern education, there is plenty of fools in store. So they probably don't need to worry about that. The society would run out of time before it run out of well-meaning and patronizing citizens. He speaks out. And i would rather live my own life to the fullest.